Home » Convicted of rioting despite no evidence of rioting? How will this work with the Poly U siege?

Convicted of rioting despite no evidence of rioting? How will this work with the Poly U siege?

by admin

There is something a little desperate about Hong Kong’s senior officials insisting that we still have an independent judiciary. It seems that other civic amenities have been written off.

We no longer have a vaguely democratic legislature, an accountable police force, or an elected executive. We have shredded the right to trial by jury, to bail, even to a trial in the jurisdiction where you committed the alleged offence. Our elections are fixed and our laws are made in Beijing. But by God we still have an independent judiciary. Isn’t that wonderful?

A photo taken inside the Court of Final Appeal during the Ceremonial Opening of the Legal Year 2021. Photo: GovHK.

Last week, two New York newspapers printed letters from Hong Kong officials defending the judiciary against accusations of bias. Nice timing. These epistles were closely followed by the case elegantly headlined in The Guardian “Court jails three on rioting charge despite no evidence of rioting”.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Comment